In Leadership Secrets of David the King, Bob Yandian examines the biblical events surrounding Ziba and Mephibosheth in 2 Samuel through the lens of Psalm 131. The psalm’s humility sets the tone for Yandian’s leadership philosophy. This perspective produces four principles exhibited by King David, “freedom from arrogance,“ “delegation,“ conquering the temper,“ and “following those who came before,“ that can also inspire 21st-century Christian leaders. He suggests to those who follow these guidelines, “In other words, you too can become a king of kings.“ He means this as a leader of leaders, reserving the title of the King of kings“ for Jesus Christ (74-75). This book follows David’s evolution from a servant of Saul to army commander, to pursuer of God, and finally, to king of kings. This book reveals David’s faults, failures, and shortcomings and explains in explicit detail how David humbly learned from these mistakes and became the metric for all the kings of Israel after him.
Bob Yandian served as pastor of Grace Church in Tulsa, Oklahoma. He attended Southwestern College and graduated from Trinity Bible College. He served as both instructor and dean of instructors at Rhema Bible Training Center in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma. He was also the host of a weekly teaching radio broadcast called “Precepts” with Bob Yandian.
This book is most persuasive when advocating for character development. The author offers helpful advice to emerging leaders. He warns about ascending into power too rapidly. His observations are valuable and discourage rising candidates from succumbing to their ambition and making critical mistakes that limit their potential. His emphasis on humility inspires potential leaders to pursue servant leadership and focus on character over worldly success.
Yandian encourages the idea that “promotion comes by degrees.” He states, “Psalm 131 begins with this phrase to let us know that any rank in life comes over a period of time. … Slow growth allows us to learn valuable lessons on the way up, so once we reach the top, we can stay there and truly enjoy all the benefits” (225-228). The author’s suggestion that younger workers first need time to mature and hone their skills advocates for leaders who are better prepared and have a higher chance of success. This methodical and patient approach toward assuming leadership positions provides sage advice in an age that champions a fast-track mentality.
The four leadership “secrets,” give sound advice. Leaders who are humble, capable of delegation, slow to anger, and respectful of the organization’s history and legacy stand a better chance of success than their counterparts. These principles are relevant to leaders in most disciplines.
Regarding weaknesses, this short but inconsistent resource feels like three separate books rather than a cohesive leadership lesson. Yandian struggles to connect his leadership principles with the source material. The author also fails to connect the relevance of Psalm 131 and the events found in 2 Samuel chapters nine through nineteen.
First, there is the story of Ziba and Mephibosheth. This account compares the attitudes and actions of two men who end up sharing an inheritance. The latter man reflects better character, but his leadership application is inconclusive.
Secondly, Yandian implies that the events surrounding Ziba and Mephibosheth influenced David and served as the inspiration behind Psalm 131. He states, “God’s plan for leadership and advancement is not with the Zibas of life. It is with the Mephibosheths and Davids. This is the story behind Psalm 131” (200-201). The psalm, a song of ascents, exists to encourage the reader to rest in God’s presence. Though Yandian likens Mephibosheth’s patience to this verse, it was not for the reason of promotion or prosperity. While this psalm is of great comfort for people in Mephibosheth’s circumstances, tying the two biblical passages together may be out of context. This psalm, which focuses on David’s humility and reliance on God, can connect to a gradual ascension into leadership, but there is no evidence that it links to the events in 2 Samuel.
Finally, the leadership principles championed by the author give fleeting comparisons to the source text, but there is no direct application. For example, the story of Ziba and Mephibosheth is more of a property dispute than an illustration of leadership development. If the author’s claim isephibosheth’s growth as a person, it could be argued that, despite his improvements, he lost half of his net worth to a person of questionable character. If David is the focus of this passage, then his haste in decision-making cost his friend’s descendant dearly.
Yandian’s leadership principles are sound, but his choice of relevant biblical references is puzzling. The text feels like the passages were retrofitted into the leadership principles rather than the tenets originating from textual exegesis. While the author’s desire might have been to avoid re-treading mainstream material, the obscurity and brevity of Psalm 131, coupled with the compatibility issues of the story of Ziba and Mephibosheth, produced an uneven and disjointed work. Psalm 25 and Psalm 37 are stronger examples of leadership sources. King David, through his history, his rule, and his writings, represents a vibrant leadership illustration underserved by this book.
This work’s target audience appears to be congregation members or the lay-institute where he teaches. Yandian’s book is short and conversational in tone. It is not suited for an academic setting. The book is not well written. Mistakes include misspelled names, punctuation errors, and passive voice. He struggles to connect leadership principles to the source material, and Yandian’s exposition of the text better serves devotional application than academic rigor. Students interested in studying a leadership profile of King David should read “The Heart of an Executive: Lessons on Leadership from the Life of King David.” Richard Phillips’ excellent text offers a greater breadth of biblical scholarship coupled with application to the role of an executive. By contrast, Yandian’s text is too narrow and too dependent on obscure sources.
While Yandain’s advocacy of humility, delegation, temperance, and legacy are quality attributes that would benefit leaders, better biblically-based resources exist from which leaders could glean inspiration.